Draft book
on the Rob Rombout cinema.
Note of intent
by Marc-Emmanuel Mélon, 2021
Marc-Emmanuel Mélon is a professor at the University of Liège where he teaches the history and aesthetics of cinema, photography and visual arts. His research and publications include film, photography and video art in Belgium, visual allegory, photographic discourse, vernacular photography and Alfred Hitchcock’s cinema.
“For Rob Rombout, making films is always about making a work.”
Given that every fiction film has its documentary side, every documentary film its fiction side, what is needed, in order to get the debate out of the confusion this causes, is to examine the multiple modalities of this exchange.
Rob Rombout’s cinema, which does not fully fit into either category, but rather falls within the very broad interva l that separates them, lends itself particularly well to this examination. For this filmmaker, who lives in Brussels but has been travelling and working in all continents for thirty years, making a film is neither about building a universe born of his imagination nor about capturing some reality behind which he would disappear, but in fact about gathering scattered fragments of reality like a fisherman bringing back fish of every species in his net, and arranging them as he wishes on his film’s stall.
Each of Rob Rombout’s films is a journey over a distance that can be long (sometimes to theantipodes), during which the filmmaker multiplies encounters with people who tell their stories. Some proudly express the happiness of having lived the life they wanted, while others testify to the difficulties encountered in trying to escape the constraints of existence, be they material, social, racial, emotional or cultural. All have come to accept their fate. These micro stories of life that question the recurring theme of destiny and freedom are part of a system established a priori by the filmmaker to establish links between all these fragments. There is The film “clothesline” which stretches a thread between two poles and attaches to it the diverse stories of a few travelers; the film “lace” which intertwines its stitches between several characters who do not know each other; the film “star” whose each branch is associated with a central point to which the film returns at regular intervals; the film “constellation” which, over a territory, sometimes as vast as a continent, draws an imaginary figure between arbitrarily chosen places, which have no other relationship to each other than the fact that they are called “Amsterdam”.
“From such an asserted artistic intention, which integrates fragments of reality into skillfully constructed architectures, ‘documentary style’ films are born, always responding to an artistic demand that takes precedence over the realities filmed as much as over the discourse that the filmmaker brings to them.‘’
From such an asserted artistic intention, which integrates fragments of reality into skillfully constructed architectures, “documentary style” films are born (as Walker Evans used to say about his photographic work), always responding to an artistic demand that takes precedence over the realities filmed as much as over the discourse that the filmmaker brings to them. For Rob Rombout, making films is always about making a work.
The book adopts a structure as diverse as Rob Rombout’s cinema. A first text considers the aesthetic stakes of the work as a whole. This is followed by an in-depth analysis of a dozen major films, illustrated with photograms and location photos and completed by the filmmaker’s interventions. When questioned by Guy Jungblut, he details a multitude of aspects of his work in terms of production, methods and stylistic choices.
The book is also enamelled with QR codes that give access to film excerpts.
A short biography and a filmography complete it.